Choosing a budget-friendly knife steel can be daunting, especially when comparing two popular stainless options like AUS-6 and 8Cr13MoV. Both steels are known for their reliability in everyday carry (EDC) knives, offering decent performance and straightforward maintenance. However, small differences in chemical composition, hardness ranges, and heat-treatment practices can significantly impact real-world cutting tasks—whether you’re prepping food, exploring the outdoors, or simply opening packages. In this guide, we’ll analyze each steel’s properties and highlight key considerations such as edge retention, toughness, corrosion resistance, and more, so you can make an informed choice.
AUS-6 is a Japanese stainless steel often praised for its affordability and effortless sharpening. With a moderate carbon content of around 0.60%, AUS-6 cannot reach the same high hardness levels as its siblings (AUS-8, AUS-10), but it compensates with excellent ease of maintenance. Some older production lines from brands like SOG or CRKT utilized AUS-6, especially for budget knives that needed to be user-friendly.
Key Characteristics of AUS-6:
Section Summary: AUS-6 excels in corrosion resistance and sharpenability, making it an appealing choice for users who don’t mind frequent touch-ups and want a low-cost, fuss-free steel.
8Cr13MoV is a Chinese stainless steel that has earned a solid reputation for offering balanced performance at an entry-level price point. Comprising roughly 0.80% carbon and around 13% chromium, it achieves a fair level of edge retention. This steel has been adopted by many mainstream knife brands—such as Kershaw (Cryo series), Spyderco (Tenacious line), and CRKT—because it reliably delivers a useful blend of hardness, corrosion resistance, and ease of sharpening.
Key Characteristics of 8Cr13MoV:
Section Summary: For a budget steel, 8Cr13MoV stands out by balancing affordability with respectable edge retention, making it a popular choice among well-known knife manufacturers.
While both AUS-6 and 8Cr13MoV contain around 13% chromium or more (qualifying them as stainless), noticeable differences in carbon and other elements lead to distinct performance profiles.
AUS-6 (Typical):
8Cr13MoV (Typical):
Key Takeaways:
Section Summary: Chemical composition is the foundation of performance. A higher carbon content in 8Cr13MoV tips the scales toward better edge retention, whereas AUS-6 trades some hardness for a simpler sharpening experience.
In practice, these ranges can shift based on brand-specific heat treatments, and certain manufacturers might push hardness slightly higher or lower. Generally:
Section Summary: The slightly broader hardness potential of 8Cr13MoV usually translates into better edge retention, while AUS-6 stays on the softer side for minimal sharpening fuss.
Understanding how each alloying element influences the steel can help you predict knife performance:
Section Summary: Each element plays a specialized role. In budget stainless steels like AUS-6 and 8Cr13MoV, the balance of carbon and chromium is particularly important for determining overall hardness and corrosion resistance.
A defining factor in any knife steel’s performance is the heat-treatment process:
Section Summary: Even though AUS-6 and 8Cr13MoV are relatively easy to heat-treat, a reputable brand’s optimized process can significantly enhance edge retention and toughness.
Section Summary: Choose AUS-6 for minimal sharpening hassle in lower-intensity cutting tasks, or opt for 8Cr13MoV if you want slightly longer edge life and better performance in moderate chores.
Both steels contain enough chromium—over 13%—to be classed as stainless. Consequently:
Section Summary: If you want a steel that naturally forms a patina, neither AUS-6 nor 8Cr13MoV is suitable. Their stainless nature resists the oxidation typical of high-carbon steels.
Section Summary: Affordable, widely available, and easy to maintain, these steels are prime candidates for newcomers to knife collecting and sharpening.
Property | AUS-6 | 8Cr13MoV |
---|---|---|
Typical Hardness (HRC) | 55–58 | 57–59 |
Corrosion Resistance | Very Good | Very Good |
Toughness | Good | Good |
Edge Retention | Poor–Moderate (heat-treat dependent) | Fair |
Ease of Sharpening | Excellent | Very Good |
Typical Uses | Light EDC, Kitchen | Moderate EDC, Kitchen, Light Bushcraft |
Table Takeaway: Note how AUS-6’s prime advantage is effortless sharpening, while 8Cr13MoV leans toward more balanced performance in everyday cutting.
Pros:
Cons:
Pros:
Cons:
Section Summary: These pros and cons reflect typical use-cases for each steel. AUS-6 is all about easy upkeep, while 8Cr13MoV aims for a middle ground of performance and affordability.
Selecting between AUS-6 and 8Cr13MoV depends on what you value most:
For Quick Sharpening & Ease of Maintenance:
AUS-6 makes blade upkeep a breeze, perfect if you frequently dull your knives and don’t mind quick touch-ups.
For Better All-Around Performance:
8Cr13MoV’s higher potential hardness and carbon content lend it a slight edge in wear resistance, making it a favorite in a wide range of EDC folders.
Neither steel is intended for extreme tasks compared to heavy-hitter steels like D2, 5160, or CPM 3V. Yet for individuals seeking decent performance on a limited budget, both handle everyday or kitchen chores affordably and without specialized sharpening equipment.
Final Thought: Whichever steel you choose, look to reputable knife makers who apply optimized heat treatments. Even a “humble” budget steel can perform admirably when crafted and tempered correctly.
Thank you for exploring our comprehensive comparison of AUS-6 vs. 8Cr13MoV!
If you enjoyed this guide, consider checking out our other articles on budget-friendly steels and heat-treatment fundamentals. Feel free to share any personal experiences you’ve had with AUS-6 or 8Cr13MoV in the comments below!
© 2025 New Knife Day. All rights reserved.