CTS XHP vs CPM S35VN Knife Steel Comparison

A Comprehensive Comparison of Carpenter CTS XHP and Crucible CPM-S35VN

Below is an improved guide for knife enthusiasts and collectors interested in the nuances of these two outstanding stainless steels—Carpenter CTS XHP and Crucible CPM-S35VN. You will find additional insights on heat-treatment ranges, edge geometry, and real-world examples, as well as minor factual clarifications and SEO-friendly enhancements. By the end of this post, you’ll have a solid understanding of which steel might be the best fit for your needs.

---

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1. INTRODUCTION
2. CHEMICAL COMPOSITION OVERVIEW
3. TYPICAL HARDNESS (ROCKWELL C) RANGES & PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS
4. PERFORMANCE CHARACTERISTICS
5. DETAILED ALLOY ELEMENT EFFECTS
6. HEAT-TREATMENT NUANCES AND FORGING
7. PATINA FORMATION & PROTECTIVE COATINGS
8. REAL-WORLD APPLICATIONS: WHICH STEEL FOR WHICH TASK?
9. COST, AVAILABILITY, AND MAINTENANCE
10. PROS & CONS FOR EACH STEEL
11. COMPARISON TABLE
12. IDEAL USES AND WHY PICK ONE?
13. CONCLUSION: KEY TAKEAWAYS

---

1. INTRODUCTION

Carpenter CTS XHP and Crucible CPM-S35VN are both premium stainless steels that combine excellent corrosion resistance, toughness, edge retention, and relative ease of sharpening. They have garnered a reputation among knifemakers and knife enthusiasts as reliable, high-performance steels suitable for various cutting applications—from everyday carry (EDC) folders to demanding bushcraft or tactical blades.

• CTS XHP:
– Developed by Carpenter Technology, CTS XHP is often described as having some of the best characteristics of both stainless and high-carbon tool steels.
– It is a powder metallurgy steel with relatively high carbon (about 1.6%) and chromium content (about 16%). Some users describe it colloquially as “stainless D2,” thanks to its fine edge potential and wear resistance.

• CPM-S35VN:
– Produced by Crucible Industries, CPM-S35VN is an evolution of the already popular CPM-S30V.
– It includes niobium to further refine the grain structure and improve overall toughness while retaining excellent stainless properties. It’s famously used by Chris Reeve Knives and many major production brands.

Note: Both steels are part of a broader family of modern “super steels,” such as M390/20CV or Magnacut, each with its own unique properties. However, CTS XHP and CPM-S35VN remain highly regarded for their blend of everyday usability, excellent performance, and relative accessibility.

---

2. CHEMICAL COMPOSITION OVERVIEW

Below is an at-a-glance look at the major alloying elements and their general functions in these steels. Percentages are approximate and can vary slightly by batch or maker specifications.

CTS XHP (Powder Metallurgy)

• Carbon (1.6%): Enhances hardness and edge retention.
• Chromium (16%): Delivers stainless properties and helps with wear resistance.
• Manganese (0.5%): Assists in hardenability and grain refinement.
• Molybdenum (0.8%): Increases strength, hardness, and toughness.
• Nickel (0.35%): Can help with toughness and may enhance corrosion resistance synergy.
• Silicon (~0.4–0.6%): Improves strength; used as a deoxidizer in steelmaking.
• Vanadium (0.45%): Improves wear resistance and grain structure.

CPM-S35VN (Powder Metallurgy)

• Carbon (1.38%): Boosts hardness and edge retention.
• Chromium (14%): Provides corrosion resistance, forms chromium carbides.
• Molybdenum (2%): Adds hardness and helps form strong carbides, improving toughness.
• Niobium (0.5%): Improves grain refinement and toughness by creating stable carbides.
• Vanadium (3%): Enhances wear resistance and promotes a fine grain.

Chemical Disclaimer: Composition data often vary slightly. If precise percentages matter for your project, consult the manufacturer’s datasheet.

---

3. TYPICAL HARDNESS (ROCKWELL C) RANGES & PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS

CTS XHP

• Often hardened between HRC 60 and 64, depending on the specific heat-treatment protocol and desired balance of toughness and hardness.
• Around HRC 61–62 is a popular sweet spot, providing robust edge retention while maintaining enough toughness for general use.

CPM-S35VN

• Typically heat-treated to about HRC 58–61. Some makers push it slightly higher, but going too high can reduce toughness.
• HRC 59–60 is common, delivering a balanced performance of hardness, corrosion resistance, and ease of sharpening.

In practical terms, slight differences in HRC can affect how well a blade holds an edge under hard use, as well as how prone it might be to chipping or rolling. Both steels, when heat-treated properly, land in a “sweet spot” that caters to a variety of knife applications.

---

4. PERFORMANCE CHARACTERISTICS

By qualitative measure:

Corrosion Resistance

• CTS XHP: Very good corrosion resistance.
• CPM-S35VN: Very good corrosion resistance.
• Both steels are well-suited for use in environments with moisture or humidity, making them great for EDC knives or field use where rust could be a concern.

Toughness

• CTS XHP: Good toughness.
• CPM-S35VN: Good toughness, aided by niobium for refined grain structure.
• Both can withstand moderate impacts and lateral stresses—crucial for bushcraft tasks or tactical folders.

Edge Retention

• CTS XHP: Very good edge retention, particularly if you prefer a super-fine edge.
• CPM-S35VN: Also boasts excellent edge retention.
• End-users might see slight variances in performance, but both steels are well-regarded for everyday wear resistance.

Ease of Sharpening

• CTS XHP: Good ease of sharpening, especially given its high carbon content.
• CPM-S35VN: Also straightforward to sharpen for a high-end steel, largely due to the refined carbide structure (vanadium + niobium).
• Both steels present a finer grain structure compared to older high-vanadium steels, making them somewhat more user-friendly.

Edge Geometry Tip: For general use, a 15°–20° per side bevel is common. Blades in these steels can accommodate relatively thin edges without excessive chipping, provided the heat treatment is well-executed.

---

5. DETAILED ALLOY ELEMENT EFFECTS

• Carbon: Elevates hardness and wear resistance in both CTS XHP and CPM-S35VN.
• Chromium: Offers stainless properties, essential for corrosion resistance.
• Vanadium (and Niobium in S35VN): Increases wear resistance and refines grain structure. A finer grain promotes a keener edge and can enhance toughness.
• Molybdenum: Contributes to deep hardenability, fracture toughness, and strength at high temperatures (useful in forging or heat-treating).
• Nickel (in CTS XHP): May add some extra toughness and corrosion resistance synergy.

---

6. HEAT-TREATMENT NUANCES AND FORGING

CTS XHP

• As a powder metallurgy steel with high carbon and chromium, proper heat-treat cycles are essential to prevent issues like grain growth and to ensure even carbide distribution.
• While generally user-friendly to heat-treat, some knifemakers emphasize precise temperature control and soak times to maximize toughness and edge stability.
• Warping or cracking is not commonly reported compared to very high-vanadium steels, but consistency in temperature thresholds remains vital for best results.

CPM-S35VN

• Known for being a relatively forgiving steel to heat-treat among high-end stainless options.
• The addition of niobium refines carbides, helping reduce the risk of large grain structures.
• Normalizing cycles can be employed but are typically not as critical as with simpler high-carbon steels.
• As with all stainless steels, a controlled environment (vacuum furnace or precise temperature control) ensures the best possible outcome.

Heat-Treat Reference: Always follow the manufacturer’s guidelines or industry-trusted protocols. Minor adjustments can significantly impact final properties such as hardness and toughness.

---

7. PATINA FORMATION & PROTECTIVE COATINGS

Because both CTS XHP and CPM-S35VN are stainless steels, they are far less prone to developing a patina than carbon steels. Under extreme conditions (e.g., saltwater or acidic environments left unattended), minor discoloration could occur, but generally, these steels are built to resist corrosion more effectively.

• Patina Formation:
  – Rare in these steels. If you notice any slight discoloration, it is typically superficial and not a typical “patina” seen in non-stainless steel but perhaps mild surface oxidation.

• Protective Coatings:
  – Most knives in CTS XHP or CPM-S35VN typically do not require coatings. However, some manufacturers may add a DLC (Diamond-Like Carbon) or PVD (Physical Vapor Deposition) coating for aesthetics or additional scratch resistance.
  – Maintenance is still important: Wiping down and oiling the blade occasionally will keep it in top shape.

---

8. REAL-WORLD APPLICATIONS: WHICH STEEL FOR WHICH TASK?

Everyday Carry (EDC) Folders

• Both steels provide a blend of corrosion resistance, toughness, and edge retention. You can’t go wrong with either.
• CTS XHP might have a slight advantage for those who value a super-fine, long-lasting edge.
• CPM-S35VN is also excellent, offering more widespread availability (e.g., Chris Reeve Knives, Spyderco, Zero Tolerance), which can mean more options in the marketplace.

Bushcraft or Camping

• Good toughness is important here—splitting wood or performing heavy-duty tasks. Both steels are generally strong enough when properly heat-treated.
• CPM-S35VN’s slightly refined microstructure might lend a bit better chip resistance, but in practice, they are quite comparable.

Kitchen Use

• Stainless properties are paramount due to constant exposure to moisture and acidic foods. Both steels do very well.
• Ease of sharpening is beneficial for kitchen knives; both are manageable with standard sharpening methods.

Survival or Tactical Applications

• Durability, resistance to the elements, and consistent performance in harsh conditions are essential.
• Both CTS XHP and CPM-S35VN fit this role, though you’ll often see CPM-S35VN in more production tactical fixed blades due to wide adoption and consistent performance.

Other Comparisons: Steels like M390/Magnacut offer different balances of wear resistance and toughness. However, CTS XHP and CPM-S35VN remain popular choices for many real-world cutting tasks.

---

9. COST, AVAILABILITY, AND MAINTENANCE

Cost

• CPM-S35VN knives may be more commonly found, often with a slightly lower or similar price compared to CTS XHP.
• CTS XHP can be found in mid- to high-range knives but may sometimes carry a premium, depending on brand and availability.

Availability

• CPM-S35VN is widespread among U.S.-based manufacturers and many custom knife makers globally.
• CTS XHP is also available but less ubiquitous. It remains popular in many premium lineups from select brands or small-batch custom makers.

Maintenance

• Routine cleaning: Wipe down your blade after each use, especially if exposed to corrosive substances like salt or acidic juices.
• Light oil or rust inhibitor: While these steels have very good corrosion resistance, a thin coat of oil helps protect pivot areas or hidden surfaces, prolonging the knife’s lifespan.

---

10. PROS & CONS FOR EACH STEEL

Below is a quick bullet-point summary:

CTS XHP – Pros

• Very good corrosion resistance.
• Good toughness and edge retention.
• Fine-grained steel with a tool-steel feel.
• Good ease of sharpening.
• Excellent for a wide range of cutting tasks.

CTS XHP – Cons

• Might be slightly pricier or harder to find in certain production knives.
• Heat-treat demands attention for optimal hardness and toughness balance.

CPM-S35VN – Pros

• Very good corrosion resistance.
• Good toughness and edge retention.
• Good ease of sharpening, thanks in part to niobium refinement.
• Widely available with a proven track record among producers.

CPM-S35VN – Cons

• Often overshadowed by newer “latest and greatest” steels (e.g., Magnacut, M390), but still offers top-tier performance.
• Edges can micro-chip at higher hardness if the heat-treat is not dialed in perfectly.

---

11. COMPARISON TABLE

Below is a simplified table summarizing some of the key points:

CHARACTERISTIC	CTS XHP (Powder)	CPM-S35VN (Powder)
Corrosion Resistance	Very Good	Very Good
Toughness	Good	Good
Edge Retention	Good	Good
Ease of Sharpening	Good	Good
Typical HRC	~60–64	~58–61
Availability	Moderate	High
Price Range	Mid–High	Mid–High

Edge Geometry Note: Due to fine grain structures, both steels can handle relatively acute edge angles so long as the heat-treatment is well-executed.

---

12. IDEAL USES AND WHY PICK ONE?

CTS XHP

• Ideal for those wanting a stainless steel that feels closer to a tool steel in its fine edge and wear properties.
• Great for EDC folders, hunting blades, and even kitchen knives where a keen, long-lasting edge is a priority.
• Pick it if you find a specific model or maker that executes its heat-treat exceptionally well, or if you want something slightly unique compared to more common steels.

CPM-S35VN

• Excellent “all-rounder” steel, widely available in production and custom knives.
• Works well for EDC, bushcraft, tactical, and even culinary knives, with balanced performance across the board.
• Pick it for proven reliability, ease of maintenance, and broad market offerings.

---

13. CONCLUSION: KEY TAKEAWAYS

Choosing between CTS XHP and CPM-S35VN often comes down to personal preference, knife availability, and specific use cases. Both steels offer:

• Very good corrosion resistance
• Good toughness
• Good edge retention
• Good ease of sharpening

CTS XHP shines for users who enjoy a slightly higher carbon content, potentially giving an extra edge in cutting performance if heat-treated perfectly. CPM-S35VN is tried and tested, widely adopted by the industry, and delivers a nearly flawless combination of properties at a hardness that remains user-friendly to sharpen.

• If you’re seeking exceptional durability in all kinds of environments with consistent performance: Choose CPM-S35VN.
• If you want a steel that feels close to a high-carbon tool steel but without the typical rust issues: Choose CTS XHP.

Ultimately, both are excellent choices. You won’t regret owning a knife in either steel, as they each strike an attractive balance of corrosion resistance, toughness, edge retention, and maintenance ease. Whichever you select, proper heat-treatment and regular care will ensure it serves you well for years to come.

---

SEO Tip: Meta Description

“Compare CTS XHP vs CPM-S35VN, two premium stainless steels prized by knife enthusiasts. Discover chemical compositions, hardness ranges, and real-world performance to find your perfect blade alloy.”

---

Disclaimer: Actual performance varies by heat-treatment protocol, blade geometry, and intended use. Always refer to manufacturer guidelines or consult a professional knifemaker for best results.