When it comes to premium knife steels, Böhler-Uddeholm’s M390 has long been a favorite among collectors and enthusiasts for its impressive combination of corrosion resistance, edge retention, and overall high performance. In recent years, another steel from Böhler-Uddeholm—M398—has started to gain attention. This newcomer offers an intriguing twist on M390’s characteristics, potentially pushing the boundaries of edge retention even further. If you’re wondering how these two high-end powdered metallurgy steels stack up against each other, this comprehensive guide is for you.
Below, we’ll explore their compositions, typical hardness ranges, real-world performance, heat-treatment nuances, cost, and ideal uses—plus address some frequently asked questions at the end. Whether you’re interested in heavy slicing, everyday carry (EDC), or professional kitchen scenarios, read on to decide which steel best suits your needs.
M390 is a powdered metallurgy (PM) stainless steel renowned for its balanced performance. Böhler-Uddeholm engineered M390 to offer:
Collectors often choose M390 for its “sweet spot” of properties—it’s difficult enough to hold a keen edge for a long time yet not so challenging to sharpen as some more extreme “super steels.”
M390 typically hardens in the range of about 60–62 HRC. Some custom knife makers might push it slightly higher (up to ~62–63 HRC) if they’re seeking maximum edge retention, but going too hard can impact toughness. At around 60–62 HRC, most users find an excellent balance between edge stability and durability. Many blades also benefit from a cryogenic step in the heat treatment, which helps convert retained austenite to martensite, enhancing hardness and wear resistance.
Because M390 combines high rust resistance, solid edge retention, and moderate toughness, it’s considered a versatile choice for users who want a premium stainless steel without venturing into overly specialized territory.
Similar to M390, M398 is made using a powdered metallurgy process. However, the higher carbon (2.7%) and vanadium (7.2%) content sets the stage for a steel that can achieve even greater wear resistance. The trade-off is typically lower toughness compared to M390. Although official toughness numbers are not always published, manufacturer data and anecdotal testing agree that M398 prioritizes edge retention above all else. It remains highly corrosion-resistant (thanks to 20% chromium), though it may chip more easily under heavy impact.
M398 is often heat-treated to slightly higher hardness ranges than M390—commonly around 61–64 HRC. The possibility of going above 62 HRC can yield remarkable edge-holding capacity, but toughness will decrease further. For those who seek maximum slicing longevity—cutting rope, cardboard, or other fibrous materials—M398 at the upper end of its hardness scale can be extremely effective.
While M398 can excel at these specific uses, it’s not the first choice for applications requiring higher toughness (like batoning or prying). In short, if you’re comfortable avoiding rough tasks and want to extend time between sharpenings, M398 might be the steel for you.
Both M390 and M398 rely on a balanced composition that includes significant amounts of chromium, carbon, and vanadium, among other elements. Below is a quick breakdown:
Carbon
Chromium (20% in both)
Vanadium
Molybdenum
Tungsten & Silicon
Manganese
M390 is relatively straightforward to heat-treat for metallurgists familiar with high-end stainless steels. It generally does not require extremely specialized steps, though precise protocols help optimize the hardness/toughness balance:
Being designed for higher attainable hardness, M398 can be more finicky:
Both steels are typically used in stock-removal processes rather than forging because of their high vanadium content:
M390 | M398 | |
---|---|---|
Hardness Range (HRC) | ~60–62 | ~61–64 |
Edge Retention | 7 (Excellent) | Potentially higher than 7 (Outstanding) |
Corrosion Resistance | 9 (Very High) | Very High (similar to M390) |
Toughness | 4 (Moderate) | Likely lower than 4 (Moderate-to-Low) |
Ease of Sharpening | 5 (Moderate effort) | Harder to sharpen (diamond/CBN recommended) |
Notable Advantage | Balanced performance for most tasks | Maximal wear resistance for heavy cutting |
Pros
Cons
Pros
Cons
Choosing between M390 and M398 depends on your priorities. If you want a nearly perfect blend of overall performance—high corrosion resistance (9), very good edge retention (7), and moderate toughness (4)—M390 will likely make you happiest. It’s more established, somewhat easier to sharpen (rated 5), and is widely available across many knife models and price points.
On the other hand, if you’re a collector or seasoned user who values maximum wear resistance and doesn’t mind investing in specialized sharpening equipment (and careful handling to avoid heavy impact), M398 may be your ultimate high-end choice. Its high carbon and vanadium content can produce a wickedly long-lasting edge, but you’ll pay for it in reduced toughness and increased difficulty at the sharpening bench.
For bushcrafters, survivalists, and those who push their blades hard: M390’s moderate toughness is probably safer. For professional chefs and heavy slicers seeking to minimize sharpening intervals, M398 could be an enticing option—just be mindful of potential chipping with bones or very hard materials.
Overall, both steels represent top-tier metallurgy. Whether you lean toward M390 or M398, you’ll be getting a premium stainless steel that outperforms most conventional alternatives. Don’t forget: no matter how advanced the steel, proper heat treatment, blade geometry, and user technique are still paramount for an outstanding knife.
Q: How do M390 and M398 compare to other super steels like S90V, S110V, or Maxamet?
A: These steels all occupy the upper echelons of edge performance. M390 and M398 are more stainless than many alternatives, though Maxamet or S110V may beat them in raw wear resistance. However, M390 and M398 are still more than sufficient for most high-end needs and offer strong corrosion resistance where some others may lag.
Q: Is M398 significantly harder to sharpen than M390?
A: Yes, M398’s higher vanadium content and potential for higher hardness generally make it more difficult to sharpen. You’ll likely need diamond or CBN stones to maintain a razor edge without excessive effort.
Q: Does M398 rust more easily than M390 despite its higher wear resistance?
A: Both steels have 20% chromium, so their corrosion resistance is similarly excellent. In normal use, you shouldn’t notice a big difference in rust prevention.
Q: Which steel is better for a professional kitchen?
A: If you’re careful about avoiding hard bones and want maximum edge retention, M398 can be a fantastic choice. M390 is slightly more forgiving if you occasionally apply lateral stress or encounter tougher materials.
Q: Do both steels benefit from cryogenic treatments?
A: Yes. Cryo steps help convert retained austenite to martensite, improving hardness and wear resistance for both M390 and M398.
Thank you for reading! We hope this breakdown of M390 vs. M398 helps you choose the steel that perfectly suits your cutting style, needs, and preferences. Happy collecting and cutting!
Note: This guide is based on commonly available data from Böhler-Uddeholm product sheets, knife community feedback, and anecdotal testing. Always follow the specific guidance of your knife manufacturer or custom maker for the best results.
© 2025 New Knife Day. All rights reserved.